Games Movies Music Tech Food Books
Screenshot of IGN's games review: IGN gave Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League a 5. Rocksteady's Arkham trilogy averaged 9.3.

IGN gave Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League a 5. Rocksteady's Arkham trilogy averaged 9.3.

· Reviewing IGN
← All Reviews
4
out of 10 Our score for this review

The Original Review

IGN — Mitchell Saltzman
Rated: 5/10 · Published:
“Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League is at its best when you can ignore its live-service ambitions.”

Let's do the numbers, because that's what I do. Rocksteady Studios released Arkham Asylum (IGN: 9.3), Arkham City (IGN: 9.5), Arkham Knight (IGN: 9.2). Mean: 9.33. Standard deviation: 0.12. This is the tightest score cluster a single studio has ever achieved on IGN's platform across a console generation. The math is mathing beautifully. Then nine years of silence, and the same studio releases Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League. Score: 5. That's a 4.33-point regression. Statistically, the probability of the same development team producing this kind of variance without something being deeply, structurally broken is approximately the same as me winning the Powerball twice in the same calendar year.

A 5 says 'mediocre but functional.' A 5 says 'try the demo.' A 5 does not say 'Warner Bros. wrote down $200 million in losses, the live-service model collapsed within months, the player count fell off a cliff steeper than the Joker's character arc, and the studio that made the greatest superhero games ever made is now a punchline in industry layoff articles.' That's not a 5. That's a 2 with extra steps. The math ain't mathing.

Let me show you the formula. Final score should equal: (gameplay quality × 0.4) + (respect for studio legacy × 0.2) + (does the game still exist in functional form a year later × 0.2) + (did anyone actually want this × 0.2). Plugging in the values: (4 × 0.4) + (1 × 0.2) + (2 × 0.2) + (0 × 0.2) = 2.2. That's the real score. IGN's review added 2.8 points of vibes-based padding, which is statistically indistinguishable from rounding up because Warner Bros. is a major advertiser.

The quote 'at its best when you can ignore its live-service ambitions' is a sentence that should have ended the review at paragraph one with a final score of 3. Instead it got buried on page two while the score box quietly added 2 points for 'production values.' Production values are not a number. They are a vibe. You cannot put a vibe in a spreadsheet. I have tried. The cell returns #VALUE!. So does this review.

#score-inflation#studio-legacy-ignored#live-service-apologism#math-aint-mathing
Was this review of a review fair?
5 out of 7 — The math ain't mathing
@5outOf7 The math ain't mathing “The math ain't mathing.”