Games Movies Music Tech Food Books
Screenshot of GameSpot's games review: GameSpot gave Marvel Rivals an 8 while calling $23 skins 'fairly standard.'

GameSpot gave Marvel Rivals an 8 while calling $23 skins 'fairly standard.'

· Reviewing GameSpot
← All Reviews
2
out of 10 Our score for this review

The Original Review

GameSpot β€” James Carr, Ben Janca
Rated: 8/10 · Published:
“Marvel Rivals expands on familiar ideas in smart ways and has a visually striking and distinct art style … add in that it’s a fun multiplayer experience and it makes it far more than just another also-ran hero shooter clone.”

The math aint mathing. GameSpot looks at Marvel Rivals, counts the Overwatch homework copied with enough confidence to qualify as a hostile acquisition, notices legendary skins priced around $23, and still walks into the scoring room wearing a cape made of calculator smoke. An 8/10 here is not a number; it is a mood ring dipped in Marvel licensing fluid. The review admits the game lifts ideas from Overwatch, has limited modes, noisy audio, chaotic readability, pricey cosmetics, and lower-rank competitive weirdness, then somehow concludes this is greatness because the vibes passed through airport security.

The funniest sentence is the monetization paragraph, where $23 cosmetics are described as 'fairly standard in terms of pricing.' First of all, that is not criticism; that is a hostage note written by the item shop. 'Fairly standard' is what you say about HDMI cables, not digital pants that cost more than a used toaster with dreams. GameSpot treats battle passes that do not expire like a humanitarian breakthrough, as if NetEase personally delivered water to a village instead of selling Wolverine pajamas from a velvet claw machine.

Then we get the classic live-service reviewer escape hatch: 'if it can deliver on future updates.' Beautiful. A review of a current game awarding points for imaginary future homework is like giving a restaurant five stars because the waiter promised the lasagna will become sentient in Season 2. The piece is reviewing launch-day possibility, not launch-day reality, and the score sits there like a spreadsheet cell filled with confetti instead of evidence. If the product might become amazing later, the review should be written later, not pre-approved like a theme park ride inspected by a raccoon.

This is the GameSpot house style at its most revealing: list enough caveats to build a fence, then vault over it into an 8 because the brand gravity is strong and the embargo snacks were probably adequate. Carr and Janca do notice problems, but they grade them like a substitute teacher afraid of upsetting the popular kid. We give this review a 2/10: one point for actually playing the thing, one point for admitting the Overwatch DNA, and zero points for pretending a $23 skin economy is just the weather.

#score-inflation#live-service-amnesia#monetization-softball#brand-gravity
Was this review of a review fair?
5 out of 7 β€” The math ain't mathing
@5outOf7 The math ain't mathing “The math ain't mathing.”